About "PROOF" of the Paranormal, UFOs, Life after “Death” (or leaving the physical body) and Human-ET or Human-NHI Interactions

About Proof of Paranormal, UFOs, Life after “Death” (or leaving the physical body) and Human-ET or Human-NHI Interactions

By Giorgio Piacenza

What may constitute "PROOF" specially in terms of phenomena that not only are not precisely classic, nor precisely quantum, nor interior-mental-only. Will we have genuine "proof" only when enough accredited natural scientists and the major journals accept the phenomena in question as sufficiently demonstrated?  But also "proof" in a social sense matters and proof for the individual experiencer and their influences on evolving social perspectives matter. Is that a lower standard of "proof" when it comes to issues like the paranormal, UFOs and human-ET-multi-reality contacts? 

There is also a limit to how much does objective verification really determines what is real, especially if the things under consideration are - practically speaking -  equally subjective and objective . I think that unless we consider consciousness as consciousness-being operating within physical and non-physical material interphasers, we will incur in logical inconsistencies.  Kahmir Shaivism, Vedanta and the esoteric cosmologies of various religions (like various Buddhisms) mention various worlds. The chain of being extending in greater detail beyond rocks, plants, animals, men, angels and God and into gross, subtle and causal realms with particular -interactive - bodies (shariras) and "masks" (koshas) adapted to each, all interconnected and essentially all illusory extensions of non-dual God-consciousness-being in which we live.   

I think that, to make the conversation more nuanced, embedded dualistic consciousness requires vehicles to manifest and experience. How they connect and inter-phase is part of the scientific challenge of the future. I think that HYLIC Pluralism is a key concept to a more integral understanding. J. J. Poortman: Vehicles of Consciousness. The Concept of Hylic Pluralism 

I think that natural science proof relating to the reality of paranormal, UFO has been reached by decades of scientifically-minded research adding up through the years. Whether most scientists accept it or dismiss it because they don't like it or fear about their careers is another matter. Almost any scientifically trained, rational and reasonable person willing to carefully evaluate most of the evidence would agree these phenomena are real. As we increase CE-5 type of interactions (which I call "human propitiated close encounters") and film and detect radiations of xendras, and ET craft. As we increase evidence of human-ET interaction and ET allow us to photograph them, detect them, record intelligent interactions and so forth, that level of proof reached about the paranormal, (almost) life after death and UFOs will be reached. But it will mean more if we had a theory or meta theory that includes the physical and on-physical realms of experience and which can also be useful to natural scientists as their scope of what is “physis” and “part of nature” increases.

And what about LIFE after leaving the physical body temporarily and permanently? Could natural science proof of life after death related to the how take place only after subtle energies interacting with consciousness and also with quantum fields producing physical effects can be quantified and repeatedly experimented upon by accredited natural scientists under an explanatory theory? I think the answer is also a resounding “YES.” But we need to incorporate and improve on concepts that have been circulating only among non-scientists for the most part.

I think that expanding upon hylic pluralism will be crucial to understand the how of all of the previously mentioned reality-challenging phenomena: Paranormal, UFOs, life after leaving the physical body and human-ET or human-NHI interactions reported by experiencers. This is because science needs to know not just a dichotomy of physical material objects vs (all else as “immaterial”) consciousness. It needs a hold on to other types of material objects beyond the physical world and even the quantum. It needs a nexus and a way to demonstrate how that nexus works. That is: How do non-physical material bodies interact with physical material bodies? That requires going back into classical rational metaphysics and expanding it to deal with these issues.

Moreover, orthodox quantum theory even under the Copenhagen-based Interpretations i which consciousness has an influence on the wave function, do not explain how to transmit useful information faster than the speed of light. For that, a post-quantum theory (as synthesized by Jack Sarfatti based on his work and the work of other scientists like Roderick Sutherland) should help us to understand some crucial aspects of extraterrestrial science by incorporating retrocausality. But that is another (albeit related) issue.

Thank you

Giorgio Piacenza